Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/25/2024 in all areas

  1. So i ve been living in the ocean like most of the tribes that play pvp and they are not mega tribes. And you can immediately see a big problem with resources. Why is the ocean full of oil and zero literally 0 metal nodes ? There should be metal nodes next to oil and really rich special underwater metal nodes at the lowest ocean levels like the ones in aberration since you have to fight tuso plesio mosa etc to farm underwater while wasting a scuba in extream cold. Right now we have oil everywhere but noone and i mean noone really needs that you can have way more oil from killing basilosaurous or having tusoteuthis or dungbeetle.right now we have dunkleosteus to farm stone while moving super slow on the other hand everyone use anky and argi or quetzal to farm tones faster so why even make the dino ? Artifact caves have some metal but once you build in them the metal wont spawn anyway and only mega tribes build there anyway. An other huge problem is pearls! there used to be more, now a days you are getting deleted by antimesh most of the time trying to get a node you found after looking for so long. Basically my suggestion is remove oil nodes most of them at least add metal nodes with more metal since its way harder to farm at the bottom of the ocean and add some rich special nodes to the maximum depths a nice touch would be adding some metal at the entrance of artifact caves not inside so it can actually spawn and most ppl can farm it. Upvote if you agree ty.
    2 points
  2. All this shows is that you don't know squat about Australia. Australia, like the U.S., has immigrants from a wide variety of locaations, people from all over S.E. Asia and the western pacific have been emigrating to Australia for decades. Looking at someone's skin color in a society that has long standing immigration and deciding they "don't make sense" only means that you have a very limited imagination and prefer to see cliche, obvious character selection. Beyond this, there is an element that should be super-obvious. Australia also has inter-marriage which has been going on for generations. Even if you never look beyond the shores of the island there are plenty of Australians of mixed brown/white ancestry. It's not anyone "making a point", you're projecting your ideology on other people. You're working from the assumption that when someone else does so they're doing it to make a point. Authors choose characters for a wide variety of reasons, but by far the most common reason is that an author thinks the character will be interesting. If she was straight and white you wouldn't be suggesting that anyone was trying to make a point, and yet you assume that making her brown and lesbian is somehow making a point, which is pretty silly thinking. Likewise, her wife being a "blue haired pale white chick" has no more meaning than this is the character's background. Brown people live their lives differently than you do, lesbians live their lives differently than you do, blue haired white chicks live their lives differently than you do, and so on. None of that mean that the authors are trying to bring politics into their story, that's just you projecting your values and preferences on to other people. The only thing "absolutely disrespectful" is that you mis-interpret the show to push your political and social agenda while trying to pretend that you're not. Sometimes the hero of a story is Luke Skywalker, a standard white boy from the country, sometimes the hero of the story is an intellectually superior dwarf from a noble family, sometimes the hero of the story is a brown lesbian with a white wife. If you stop making your terrible assumption that only certain people are allowed to be the hero of a story then you will find yourself enjoying stories on their own merits rather than being offended by false narratives that you've falsely constructed in your head. Nonsense, this is you projecting again. The only reference they made was that the two of them are adults who have an adult relationship - just like every other show and story about adults does. No, it's absolutely not. The significant majority of the ARK player base are of age, you can drop your hand-wringing "for the children" arguments, that's nothing more than a lie you're telling yourself to justify your hand-wringing. This must be your first day on the internet, children have access to all of the porn on the planet, not one of them are being exposed to the concept of lesbians for the first time in their lives by the ARK cartoon. And again, your insistence on "scissoring" nothing more than you trying to use dog-whistle buzzword to pretend that this was some sort of excessive display of sexuality, which was absolutely not the case. If you see two women walking into a bedroom, closing the door and the first thing that comes to your mind is "SCISSORING OMGZ!" then all you're doing is exposing your own peculiarities (and probably your own sexual fantasies as well). There are thousands of example of shows showing adults walking into a room and closing the door behind them, there's nothing strange, excessive or bizarre about it happening on this show. That's up to their parents to decide, not you. If you don't want your kids to watch this show then don't let them, but I guarantee you that millions of parents around the world don't care one tiny bit about the very tame, very non-explicit relationship shown between those two characters. Standard network TV has lot's of more explicit sexuality than was shown in ARK, and all of the big streaming services have much more material that kids watch that is more sexually explicit than Ark. And there it is, there's the true agenda driving your socio-political diatribe that you're trying to pretend isn't one. Here's a puzzle for you, natural selection and evolution are both entirely real, and yet every species (of mammal) has homosexual relationships. If the existence of homosexuality is forbidden or prevented by natural selection, why does it keep occurring? The answer is simple (even though you're not going to want to admit it), it's because homosexual relationships benefit the species as a whole. Individuals who are homosexual don't pass on their own genes directly, but they do indirectly help to pass on the genes of their family group, which still benefits the species. If you're going to try to use natural selection as the basis of your (political) argument, than you need to make sure that you understand how it works. You're pretending that natural selection supports your (political) position, but it doesn't, natural selection and evolution demonstrate why your thinking is wrong. Translation: You are, in your own words, "transphobic racists or homophobic" but you want to pretend that you're not. No, you're pointing out your own irrationality. There's no law that says you have to like gay or trans people, your feelings are your feelings. But if you're going to attempt to use arguments like natural selection to justify those feelings then you're going to need to come up with arguments that can withstand the scrutiny of logic, and yours don't. Everything you've said here has been your arguing from the position of your own collections of irrationalities.
    2 points
  3. Nonsense! That right there’s prime warm up material for a full range upper body day. Just throw an extra scoop of pre workout in the smoothie and you’ll be fine.
    1 point
  4. I really would like to feel excited about this but the many bugs make the experience so bad I do not even feel joy about new stuff anymore. The base game ASA is unplayable in this state, I have no good feeling when it comes to adding more things before fixing what we have. Will also prevent me from buying any DLC content and I bet I'm not the only one, just for your interest.
    1 point
  5. Probably not considering what type of creature it is. You can't cryo Titanosaur or Titans. Again, probably not considering what type of creature it is. You can't transfer Titanosaur or Titans. It might, but I'd have to assume no considering the difference in coding involved. It says that raising plants on it would require little to no effort, so I have to assume that there will be some form of auto fertilizer and auto irrigation on it. Probably. Since it's designed as a place to live and have your base and since you'll be able to place foundations on it. But, might not if they consider it a platform saddle creature. Probably not. They've said that it cures diseases and brings creatures back to life, but they haven't really said that it heals HP. If it does heal HP though, then I guess the answer depends on if baby creatures are coded differently than other entities in the game. If their HP is handled differently. I very extremely highly doubt it. Again, I very extremely highly doubt it. I mean, I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to have a 10,000 TON creature riding on my shoulder. 😛 I'd have to assume nerfs to HP and Damage. Probably also nerfs pertaining to how it gets tamed to make it harder to do so. Maybe also taking away the "Creature Revive" ability if they find out that it won't work and crashes the game. Or limiting the ability to certain creatures because they didn't think far enough ahead about having certain creatures able to revive upon the back of this creature. I hope this helps a little for your questions. 👍
    1 point
  6. Could you please consider visually updating the old dinosaur models such as the Brontosaurus, Diplodocus, Quetzal, Mosasaur, Megalodon, and the Araneo? These models have remained unchanged since 2016 and appear outdated when compared to recently added creatures like the Rhyniognatha, Carcharodontosaurus, and the Amargasuarus. I believe it would be a greatly appreciated surprise, especially alongside the release of the center map.
    1 point
  7. I've stopped playing the game due to the island being the most boring map byan absolute mile. I just login reset timers then wait a week b4 I rinse and repeat. I'm quite fond of the center so will play it when it's eventually released in 2035
    1 point
  8. Those were the days, when life was simple. And games launchred in a relative bugfree state.
    1 point
  9. Can oasis Saur be cryopoded? Can be transferred on other maps? Does water intake on monster waters work? Can cryofridge be installed on it? Can oasisaour water lake be used to heal dragon babies in case you don't have milk? Bread able? Used as a shoulder pet? What nerfs on it are planed after sale?
    1 point
  10. Easter is March 29. This Friday was a week before, you non counting hardboiled egg. I love that insult now too.
    1 point
  11. Im a simple man. I just want my unofficial server not to be down for long periods of time every time a patch comes in. I was under the impression I was buying a completed game.
    1 point
  12. I think some people are allergic to having a good time.
    1 point
  13. 1 point
  14. I've watched it. The action is good, voice acting is good, but almost everything else is bad. Poorly written dialogue, nonsensical plotline, characters that are cartoonishly evil (even for a cartoon), more inconsistencies with the game than there are bugs which is saying a lot, and the character backstories are boring and unnecessary as well as being incredibly cringeworthy.
    1 point
  15. I want to know more about the trains and apparent wagon!
    1 point
  16. thats one of the best insults ive ever seen, hard boiled egg LOL
    1 point
  17. And yet that's what you're doing in this thread. What you really mean is that you don't like it when people protest that you don't agree with. You don't think protesting is stupid, you only think it's "stupid" when other people do it. Oh, so you're a closet psychopath, well that explains a lot. It's nothing at all like that, this is some of your dumbest logic yet. In both cases, the street or the shooting range, I expect people who are controlling their deadly instruments (whether they're cars or guns) to hold themselves accountable for operating their devices responsibly and with proper restraint. I've been on plenty of shooting ranges and not once has anyone ever argued that it's ok to shoot people who are standing down range, regardless of whether it's accidental or intentional. Anyone who said something stupid like that would get kicked out the moment they flapped their stupid lips. Here's a pro-tip: if you're at a shooting range and you shoot someone, it's your fault no matter what they were doing. As the operator of a car or a gun it's your responsibility to ensure that no one gets injured by your device.
    1 point
  18. Yes it is, at least be honest with yourself about it.
    1 point
  19. Bad wheel...a mammal :@ but: DireWolf - Mut HP - Blu
    1 point
  20. I have to disagree with you on almost everything. I am totally enjoying the series. I'm not lesbian however I don't have a problem with it. Also the brown is in my opinion also not an issue. As for your comment "a game primarily played by underage individuals" -- I personally have played ark since ase almost from the start and I don't know "any" children that play. I haven't even come into contact with any, outside of large discords for trading. So to say (a game primarily played by underage individuals) as you did.. I must say I don't agree. perhaps if you had the numbers to back that up. Bust still nope. I am enjoying and I will continue to do so. If you aren't enjoying it then turn off your device and go breathe. Also as a side note. even put into a situation for survival our sexuality and procreation aren't the only things to determine it. If you wish to promote breeder mentality have fun with that. And finally - for you to say you aren't putting down brown people and or lesbians. you really need to reevaluate that comment. Because you certainly are. Have a nice day. PS-- I just re-read your last comment.. she looks trans?? absolutely does not. you are reaching so far with that.. you may dislocate something.
    1 point
  21. I think that your discussion should be extended to all the creatures on the island, especially the dinosaurs, the only ones that I consider good are the yuty and the thery, the mammals are already in better shape but they can be improved. the only animal that I would say is done in the best possible way is the sarcosucus
    1 point
  22. I don't need to watch it as clearly it's not worth wasting my time on something that is completely rubbish...oh and it's something that the community NEVER asked for either,but WC being so stuck up they wasted money on it by funding it themselves instead of putting that money back into the game to fix the countless problems it had and still has ..seeing that all ASA is just a reskin NOT a game that you say was built from the ground up....which everyone can see, seeing that exactly the same game breaking problems are still in the game that you have had 8 years to fix
    0 points
  23. How? How can we edit ini files on xbox as easily as we can do it on PC?
    0 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...