Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/06/2023 in all areas

  1. LOL.. expected nothing less.. I'm betting a December release is closer to reality, maybe even Feb, if they where even remotely close to releasing they would be showing in game screenshots, not UE5 asset screenshots that anyone with any experience in modelling can render in a few minutes. Can we just hurry up with getting the damn saves sorted so those of us who want to jump ship can do so without mindlessly refreshing bases for an additional 30 days while we wait.
    3 points
  2. The same applies to the Ps4 console. Only if you have an additional one Ps4, you can make a server yourself, or if you need a more powerful server, then Nitrado. Only loading a save is not possible on this Ps4 Oops, are these comments from chatgpt? it adds nothing to the statement. What graphics are you talking about have you seen ASA graphics before? Have you only been shown sketches of what it might look like, but it doesn't have to look like that either. Anyway, it's not ASA graphics, it's just a preliminary design. And even on this Crunch, there are a lot of nonsensical answers. They spam with Crunch 365. Let Gp do the spam department for them. Since it's a disgustingly littered Crunch, they only go in to vote for the creature. Reading comments like this makes me feel like I'm in kindergarten. On the other hand, why is there so much Positive Spam on so many Crunch? Why have comments not been moved to the OffTopic section of the forum? Someone rightly pointed out that you gained positives. And that's just out of greed to vote for a new pet. PS if you need a voting point go to the forum and give someone a constructive answer, not here on Crunch. Even though WC/SG shifts the release dates of the games, the price changes every 2 weeks. For most people WC/SG is not trustworthy with its changes. However, Spammers still do not understand. EDIT: GP please move this mess to the Forum, then only the right statements will remain and it will be clean to read. Well, unless you need to improve the opinions of WC / SG, but not in this way. This seems a bit of a stretched opinion.
    2 points
  3. 8 years later and nothing has changed. Delay after delay, To be honest I'm not all surprised, and I can't wait for this come out in October and still be a buggy unplayable mess.
    2 points
  4. You can't because those topics are now all hidden in preparation for the next creature vote. You've got to wait until Wildcard reveal their version of the Gigantoraptor.
    1 point
  5. 1 point
  6. I mean at this point do you really want to trust WC with that?
    1 point
  7. New design? What?? They are exactly the same design just slightly polished lmfao
    1 point
  8. To purge the Corruption from the Genesis program, which is actually a "parallel" project to the Arks. When the "Earth Federation" and the "URE" realized that their war would lead to mass extinction on earth, they decided to work together to recover from the disaster they were creating, engaging in "two separate projects": if the "Reseed" project (the Arks) to clean up the Earth fails, the "Genesis" project would remain on its way to a new home. When we complete the "Reseed", Rockwell manages to transfer to the ship "Genesis" (which was already traveling and far away) bringing with him the "Corruption" that would contaminate another planet, we will be transferred there because we Survivors have a duty to prevent it!!
    1 point
  9. Not when we already paid for all of them once. Maybe if they had a different price for current owners and brand new players, people would be a little more okay with it. Also, like was said earlier, we all want Ark 1.5 to be good, but feel that it will release late and still not work right.
    1 point
  10. disgusting that even you also reported crash reports and nothing was done about it! just goes to show you how useless the report system is. With them profiting off someone's mod idea/creation is pretty disgusting in of itself, not to mention mod is option on Ark Survival evolved, and I legit cannot even stand it. For how long it takes to join a modded server every time even with a decent system is ridiculous. Mods take forever to download and constant glitch out / stop downloading and have to retry joining the server sometimes even over an hour just trying to log into a mod server. The fact that we paid for that feature and never once was improved or fixed.
    1 point
  11. I think this is really fair, I would like even 3 winners but maybe I'm asking too much
    1 point
  12. I think what he ment is: If I want to set up a computer as server (in other words be the service provider) why is that not possible? Why are we limited to 3rd party servers and can't set up our own?
    1 point
  13. No se que pensaran los demás. Pero un diseño igual que el anterior con más calidad
    1 point
  14. I wanna see a creature model comparison. Gotta see that UE5 Dodo
    1 point
  15. Woooow como me encantan las armas primitivas, soy más fan de eso ❤️
    1 point
  16. Why are Xbox users required to pay Nitrado a monthly fee to host multiplayer servers? Open up the computer hosting anyone with a server willing to dedicate and NOT require Steam or Nitrado!
    1 point
  17. $40 for EARLY ACCESS. What a cash grab. We're paying you again to test your remaster.. mmmmm. Ridiculous. $20 for early access or bust. You won't be seeing a dime from me for this sell out. Lower your price and get twice the sales you would have with this china prices you currently have. The end result is what you want anyways.
    1 point
  18. 2050? Oh sweet summer child, I wish I were optimistic enough to believe it'd be here that early.
    1 point
  19. "the revamp of the tools looks great" lol. They havnt been revamped. They're exactly the same? Wow, some people are so easily pleased, or in ASA's case fooled lol
    1 point
  20. " it wouldn’t be feasible to complete Scorched Earth to a standard we’re happy with." When have standards ever been a priority for WC? "We had initially planned to ship with more content on Day One, but that won’t be happening, so we’re adjusting the launch price accordingly." So basically "It was a mistake to mention the DLC being included within the standard price of ASA now we reduced that price by $5 but we will later charge $15 for each map moving forward unless we decide to hike the price"
    1 point
  21. Called it. At the same time, though, I'm glad that they're not going to rush it.
    1 point
  22. Lo mas interesante de ver, es la remodelación de todos los dinos aunque el echo de que muestren esto lo hace mucho mas interesante
    0 points
  23. 0 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...