Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


DarkRaptor13 last won the day on July 17 2018

DarkRaptor13 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

317 Tribe Leader

About DarkRaptor13

  • Rank
    Hide Armor
  • Birthday December 13

Personal Information

  • ARK Platforms Owned

Recent Profile Visitors

1,828 profile views
  1. Thanks for the info, it's Nice from you ! But I won't have hopes for it on PS5, I'm not confident about it, I have a bad feeling. And if it's released years later than on Xbox... we'll have ARK 2 by the time the PS6 we'll be released maybe. Exclusivity is truly one of the worst thing. Just look at Spidey in Avengers on PS, it was a bad idea. They should stop with those consoles wars.
  2. EXCLUSIVITY ? IT'S A JOKE ?! It looked like an awesome news for 5 minutes, I was happy to see Ark coming back stronger. I had hopes it will be great, the trailer looks great ! But in facts, that's the worst possible news. I'll never play Ark 2, thanks to the Xbox Exclusivity. They choosed money over (PS) fans. I just hope this game and console will be a huge flop and they'll give up as soon as possible on it, to work on ARK 3 on all platforms. This news feels like treason for money. Worst news of the day. I'm never gonna buy a Xbox or gaming PC just for ARK.
  3. I don't want an accurate Archelon. It could be bigger, have a different behavior, additionnal spikes or rocks or plates like most of dinos in arks. But actually, they took so much liberty it's ridiculous. 6 limbs and eyes and a ugly face like that it's too much, it looks like a frankenstein monster, not an Archelon now. With a Nice head and normal number of limbs and eyes it would be great. I just feel like they turned it too much into a freakshow turtle by adding limbs and eyes. It's like taking a bird, cutting all limbs, the head, taking away the feathers and give it a potato color. Ye
  4. And maybe on the flying Cow of the Last Airbender too. 6 limbs and a "living base".
  5. Seriously guys... Is that soooo hard to design New creatures without robot/zombie/insects/chernobyl parts ?
  6. I don't want accurate creatures, I'm just asking for more creatures BASED on real creatures instead of creatures based on scifi/mythology. Jurassic Park creature aren't that accurate but I like how they create their dinos based on what we know. I want "Ark versions" of creatures like the Killer Whale, Gorgonopsyd, Archelon or Fox for example. Less Pokemon-like creatures.
  7. Yes, I know the scifi part and the evolution thing. It's okey, even the original dinos are subspecies of the real ones. I just would like more creatures based on historical (or modern) animals. You don't need to have extrem fantasy or futuristic look to creatures or super power. Some example of great creatures to add: The Killer whale, a huge SMART underwater Killing machine, beautiful and dangerous. The Gorgonopsyd, a great prehistoric predator, a good Hunter with powerful jaws. The Archelon, a huge living raft turtle. I just don't understand why they only
  8. So... Where are the dinos ? (again ?) Okey 2 new DLCs and 3 new creatures: A robot buddy A lava lizard A 4-arms gremlin-garogo hybrid Edited: and now a 6-eyes Turtle. Seriously ? Why can't we have an Archelon without insects/zombie/robot part ? Who the hell thought "yes a Turtle with 6 eyes is a great idea"? It would have looked great with only 2 regular eyes guys ! If we don't get an Archelon like the awesome one seen in one of the sponsored mods, I'm OUT of this game. I'll never buy Genisis if it's only creatures designed like this disgusting Turtle. The artis
  9. Skins or Variant for already existing creatures coud bé good. Like that Hammerhead shark from Atlas instead of Megalodon. (Could be the Ragnarok variant for Megalodon, the same way we have Aberrant variants for Aberration)
  10. New horses, a new hammerhead shark, a whale, dolphins and many mythological creatures like the hydra. It can be a very great news ! Or a very bad one... I just hope that content like those creatures will be available for ARK too. If not it would be a big waste...
  11. Saw the picture, had hope that we'll get a TLC but nope... And what the hell is this december update ? a random event that will bring back old skins ? Useless. Just stop those useless events that brings nothing new. We need TLC for so many creatures ! And real updates like S+ and quality of life content. We're still waiting.
  12. Scifi can be awesome but in ARK it just feel like they are overexploiting the scifi style. The idea to have hybrids inspired by prehistoric creatures is great, that's the JP style. Some tek armor and weapons were great additions, the scifi was well included at this time in a logical way. But now... hybrids based on real modern/extinct creatures, that got mutated, then got mechanical-element parts like robots and then got turned into zombies by a venom-like resources. What's next, they'll got magical time-traveling ability, mega-evolutions or super sayan mode and you'll be able to fu
  13. I'd better have ARK additions 's creatures on PS4 than creatures from Extinction. Modders are listening to the community while devs are just loosing themselves with scifi ridiculous maps and creatures. The new giant sloth is like the worst possible result based on this creature. It's like a 3yo kid draw it and they made it 3D, you barely detect that it's meant to be a sloth. Why not something that looks more like a real one, like the Fallout one (waaaay better)? Same with velosaur, why not a cryolophosaur or another real dino without the mechanical mutant parts... wasted. The
  14. I know I just hope they'll stop doing DLCs after this one. At first I thought DLCs would be awesome but now I just feel like I wasted money on a season pass that disappointed me from SE to Extinction. By the time I bought the season pass, WC was listening to fans, adding many creatures that the players ask for (the good old time with all dinos trailers one after one...). And at this time the thread were full of great ideas like an aquatic DLC full of prehistoric and modern marine creatures or an Ice Age DLC with more prehistoric mammals. There were lots of great ideas with aw
  15. Prehistoric creatures are a minor part of ARK ? Take a look at this website, at all the merchandising made by WC, at the game cover. How many prehistoric creatures do you see ? And how many scifi things do you see ? Their main selling argument was CLEARLY the dinosaurs. There was a lack of good dino game, they target this niche to get money and now they let down this niche and all the dino-fans. Be honest, do you really think ARK would have success WITHOUT the "minor part" that are dinosaurs ? If SE, Aberration or Extinction would have been the first & standalone game of WC, do
  • Create New...