miu1103

I was wondering, why don't we add a kind of loser's round of voting? Or, why not create two slots, one for losers who lost the previous election, and one for new voters? Then at the end, we should elect the first runner-up from the two. Or, we could implement the two first-place winners in a friendly manner. I don't think it's fair to take an idea that was defeated and put it on a different map with slight changes, while keeping the supporters of the defeated idea with you and still participate in the election. I understand that the cheetah of the owl people and the spider of the idol people are both always at the top of the list, and I understand the feelings of their supporters, but isn't it bad to fill up an important slot in the election? It would be a waste to kill new ideas, and banning defeated ideas from participating in the election again would offend their supporters, wouldn't it? Wouldn't it be a solution to have a separate election quota? Or, why don't we quit the current way of voting? If we vote one by one, people won't scream "funny" or "fraud". Well, I guess it would take a lot of time and effort... This is a personal thought, but if you really, really want to make sure that the ASA is not just a piece of artwork with improved image quality, I would like to see a revival election for each map of ideas that lost the election. To be honest, it is really atrocious when an idea that was originally supposed to work on a map reappears on another map with a few changes or distortions... And really, don't destroy new ideas on that map... If you really want to be honest, add all of the top 10 or even the top 5.... I've heard that the creatures selected for this election must have a net gun for their taming, that spiders like the idol of all places wrap gacha and other production creatures in cocoons and hang them, that gacha will be added in extinction, and that the engrams that reform elemental dust into elements, such as the mined creatures in this case, are only available for dust because of the extinction engrams....... Even if you can get the dust, it can only be used for custom recipes. Yes, none of this will be all that powerful when the aberration is implemented. Are you nuts? Really... The election we're working on now is an election that will be added to the ASA, remember? Shouldn't it be tied to only the engrams available on the target map at the idea submission and collection stage? It's good to be able to expect more success later on, but if they can't be active or stand out in the initial target map when they are added, don't you think there is no point in winning the election as the face of that map at all?

Yes, Net Projectile is a new item, and it was originally a trap and terrain item... If Net Projectile is really necessary for taming, I would like to see a change in the taming method or an adjustment in the official engrams, etc... ...

Of course there will be official implementation of new engrams and organisms on ASE paid maps such as Scorched Earth, Aberration, Extinction, Genesis, etc. in ASA, right? If not, then it would be meaningful to add all or at least 5 organisms that were selected until the final election. I mean, it seems that Net Projectile is required for the taming method of the selected creatures, but Net Projectile is an engram from Genesis 2, isn't it? You are not joking that aberration alone is not enough for taming, are you?

Gigantoraptor big