Picolo XL

Members
  • Content count

    262
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    N/A

Community Reputation

80 First Tame

1 Follower

About Picolo XL

  • Rank
    Cloth Armor
  • Birthday 07/29/94

Personal Information

  • ARK Platforms Owned
    PC

Recent Profile Visitors

1371 profile views
  1. New servers - A cry for an ORP cluster

    Defenitely something I would love to see aswell. ORP still a gamemode alot of people enjoy.
  2. ARK: State of the Game

    One part solved, now you gotta find anotehr thing that is not perfect? I guess at some point you have to live with it.
  3. ARK: State of the Game

    @Jat One question that bothers me, not for myselve but for newer / unexperienced players. What do you guys think about the mega tribes starting to take over that "new cluster"? I mean yes, alot of mega tribes will stay on the legacy cluster, but there are alot of them that got wiped (either by devs or by PvP). From what I would think those will starting taking over the big new cluster as soon as they can. Sure it may take some time. But most of those players got 5k+ hours playtime. Would you consider adding some newbie-friendly restrictions to those new servers (Even only time-based restrictions would help I guess) I think about "Max. tribe member restriction", "Time-restricted access to end-level content" and stuff like that. Woudl also like to hear what others think about that.
  4. ARK: State of the Game

    And you think the one that decides which servers are ghost towns does not look into the "ddos" /downtime historie of an server? If not then yes, that would be bad. As I said I think we will get clearification on this "ghost town" status
  5. ARK: State of the Game

    @Soulbanisher @snowman969frrlp
  6. ARK: State of the Game

    I do not beliefe that is how all of this will work.
  7. ARK: State of the Game

    Cannot speak for consoles but it was said that PvE Server will have access to the new content (Ragnarok) aswell, even tho they are not on the "New Cluster" in that meaning. I guess it shoudl be the same for consoles.
  8. ARK: State of the Game

    If I would compare it with extinction I woudl say it is an 2-3 year extinction server. I think a ghost town will be considered a server with less then 10 players for 99% of the time or somethin. But I understand ur worries, there defenitely needs to be some clearification on what a "ghost town" really means.
  9. ARK: State of the Game

    What makes you think that? The part with the ragnarok server being on the new clusters are directed towards console servers I think. I am playing on an isolated PC Server and would not even care that much, but I do not think that wildcard will wipe the hard work of 5 weeks from those ppl (Well to be fair lets lower it to 3 weeks considering all downtimes )
  10. ARK: State of the Game

    As Long as your tribe stays on that server (And I expect you to at least have some allied tribes aswell), I dont think your server will be considered a "Ghost town"
  11. ARK: State of the Game

    Guys no need to hate on PvE really, I completely understand the point of all those that want a new cluster. @Jat said more then once that nothing is set in stone and for now you cannot change anyones opinion by spamming this breeding/duping/trading stuff all over here. I guess by now everyone knows that there is stuff to think/discuss about but we dont need to hatespeech each other and start a PvP vs PvE Battle.
  12. ARK: State of the Game

    Where is that not a clear answer?
  13. ARK: State of the Game

    He already answered that question, Look throught his responses on page 2-4.
  14. ARK: State of the Game

    That has nothing to do with ur statement about the trading forum tho.
  15. ARK: State of the Game

    Do not think that this would make sense. Legacy players will always be two years ahead of the new servers, no matter how long you wait. It would neber be fair towards the onces playing on the new servers.