CosmicSkeleton

Man, wildcard really just sat back and assumed everyone on official was a mindless consumer who'd shell out money for a product they already own but prettier and thank them for deleting nearly a decade of hard work. You guys vastly, and I do mean VASTLY overestimate the value of this game if you think that'll fly for all but the most diehard braindead ark stans. What next, rhyniognatha will be exclusive to ASA?

They probably won't bother this close to the end. Our poor raptors must suffer unto eternity

You say this as if every ark player has an account here and complains and comments on every thread.

It seems to vary from person to person. I never have issues with crashing during transfers, play or bosses. However for some godforsaken reason recently I've been crashing every time I exit to the main menu. Wildcard needs to iron out its primary issues rather than doing the gaming equivalent of putting a broken transmission in a new car

Unless you literally do not log on unless they do an EVO you do that anyway.

Pointing out that one already happened and you're not cut out for official if you constantly whine about EVO is white knighting now? I rip on wildcard for things that make sense. Not having a constant boost when there are servers with a permanent boost ain't something worth ripping on.

They did one last week. Not their problem if you somehow can't survive without one every week. Either get off official or learn to make due rather than fussing about handouts.

Not sure why you're agreeing. Anyone that needs a breed boost for every or every other EVO shouldn't be playing official, period. They need to find a boosted server and leave official to the players that want ark as is

I feel nothing. They know what they did. You should be doing that anyway.

Not going to lie; that diplo pic activated my fight or flight response. Years of being in the tek era and diplodocus still manage to trigger my "get the hell away from me" mode.

Oh make no mistake, I'm not saying that in defense of WC, I'm saying it to mean that it's sadly business as usual for them

Considering how much is wrong with ark 1 they'd genuinely be better off doing the sequel from the ground up. If they didn't it'd basically be the equivalent of trying to put a transmission in a twenty+ year old car with 300,000 miles on it rather than buying a new one.

The last few months doesn't mean they'll do it every time. Keep going through EVO history and you'll see what I mean. Sometimes they'll do it back to back, sometimes they won't.

Outside of scorched earth ark has to my memory never released anything big on time. This should surprise no one.

Because not every EVO does breeding rates.

Also a valid point to bring up. Unless everyone conspired together to make each fossil have the same skeletal features down to minute details and then when through the painstaking process of making sure all of them got jumbled differently to make it look authentic it would be hard to believe that each one is fake. Maybe a handful are forgeries or piecemeal, but all of them? I don't see it.

Again it's hard to take that link at face value with Werner being a cited source

That's the trouble with paleontology. We have so little to work with; so few intact specimens, so many eons of evolutionary shifts yet undiscovered, so much land to cover, fossils swallowed or simply tossed about by the depths of an ever rising and falling sea and crushed to shale beneath its weight and tides. The land issue is particularly troublesome since spots containing fossils could very well have been uprooted and destroyed for the march of civilization. Who knows how much we've lost because farmer brown needed more land for crops or big daddy gubmint decided that some random patch of land would be the perfect spot to pave a new road that'll just be filled with potholes within the year because the ground was never stable enough for it.

Gonna have to side with Joe on this. It's more or less equivalent to trying to defer to Jack "the Rex was whack" Horner for information regarding the lifestyle of tyrannosaurus. Lots of speculation but without someone to back it, it's hard to just take it at face value.

You're using quotations but I need a link to a source dude. As an aside convergent evolution is a thing. Animals evolve similar features all the time despite not actually being related. Take for example anteaters and pangolins, two entirely different animals from entirely different ecosystems who's only connection is that they're both in class mammalia. In spite of they they've both evolved forelimbs and tongues designed for digging up ant/termite mounds to devour the occupants. Feathers may not necessarily be a sign that one became another, they may just be something that came about because for one reason or another they made the animal with them more successful and thus got passed on to future generations.

Pretty sure most fossils that come out of china at this point are either real and end up in some rich dudes private collection or fake and reconstructed out of multiple different fossils or materials. That aside weren't maniraptorians one of the few groups that we knew had species that were feathered?

That's neat. A man is dead by the way, just figured I'd tell you in case you were too eager to complain in a thread that will do nothing to resolve your issue to read it.

I feel like breedable dungs would be a nightmare for at least the first few days if folks happen to have left opposite gendered pairs out since they have to be set to wander to make fertilizer. Just imagine the endless cycle of mating cool downs or babies if the egg temp fell within the ambient temperature range of your map.

Small miracles, aye?

They didn't do it with desmodus. No reason to expect them to do it now. Hoping a creature suggestion is bad out of sheer spite really ain't it chief.