TyranntX

Just now, GaintWalrusOfDeath said:

Okay 1, What do you mean "Carcharodontosaurus doesn't need to be in the game", people like big theropods, whats the harm of adding in just one more.

And Second, it doesn't have to make sense this is Ark after all, ever sense they add in tek saddles and all the other crazy stuff they added to the game they can pretty much do what ever the heck they want. You mean to tell me the devs are going to be like "We can add in a giant space whale but a Dino with a Chainsaw and Missile Launchers on its saddle, thats too far fetched for this game". lol 😆

1... people also like race cars, jeasus, country music, guitars, and any number of things. That doesn't mean it is somethig the game NEEDS.

2,,, Tek saddles are futuristic technology and make sense when you take the game's lore into consideration. YOUR saddle idea is like something out of a Mad max  movie, a horrible one at that.

3 minutes ago, TimeBomb2003 said:

Well too bad, cause we getting it anyways!

And it won't to anything you want it to, and you'll whine and complain about it anyway.

2 minutes ago, BriskEcho said:

i agree, its just another rex/allo/giga to be honest, i would much rather something else get in, thats not the bison because at this point we have too many animals like the ovis and stuff like that

In the Bison's defense it can do a lot more than just be a sheep clone. Hell I don't know how many farmers sheer their cows anyway. Carchara on the other hand cannot say such things.

8 minutes ago, AllOfTheAllos said:

I like that the bat is going to be a thing, and I also love that carchar will be finally a thing too (does that make me a "literal 8 year old"? Because I certainly don't feel any younger just because I know what I like and am excited to have more of that)

Do I need to repeat myself on weather or not the game needs Carchara? (it doesn't). Because it looks like people are slowly losing their ability to pay attention.

11 minutes ago, GaintWalrusOfDeath said:

Well I certainly want this and im sure there are some people out there that want it. Plus I think it would be really fun to run around in any map with that stuff on its saddle, if we can get the Tropeognathus with a Jet engine and Grenade launcher then why not have Carchar with Missile launchers and a Chainsaw! 😎💥

Congratulations, you just announced how 10 years old you look. Tropeo actually adds something unique and needed to the game, Carchara does not. 

Also what sense does adding rocket launchers and chainsaws to the base of a creature's saddle even make? This is Ark not Paraworld.

1 minute ago, GaintWalrusOfDeath said:

Even though it didn't win the vote at least their finally going to add in the Carcharodontosaurus at some point. Now Im wondering what they plan on doing with it, Im hoping they will us my idea (but I doubt it). 🤞

Not this, and not what anyone who wanted it wants.

10 minutes ago, Bulborb87 said:

Don't feel bad for the Carchar just yet, they did confirm that theropod will also be added later on as a free update later on this year

You say that as if it's a good thing, it isn't

4 minutes ago, Chrysa1is said:

The bison is far superior than the Charizardsaur dino or whatever it's called. Id rather milk, epic insulation and unique fertilizer, than another boring carnivore dino.

cows/oxen are also the icon of beasts of burden, so extreme reduced carry weight can also be added to that list. Throw in a cart to have it pull around and all the other abelites mentioned and you got one "beefy" creature... Sorry had to make that pun.

1 minute ago, TekTusoteuthis said:

I was even thinking the goat would have been cool. Having a big Gogoat to ride up was growing on me.

My thought was since we have Horses, Sheep, Pigs, Goats (Shinhorn), and Chickens then why not Cows too?

Just now, TekTusoteuthis said:

Let's go Giant Bat! Woo! They could make the Charcar interesting in its utility but I do think the bison should have gotten runner up.

Yep, Toats should have been the bison

4 minutes ago, thehalogrunt798 said:

yea i dont really like that we are getting the carchar but I'd rather this than a bison that has no pvp purposes

 

PvP is  For Thugs, Cyber Bullies, and trolls. It's a Cancerous dung show and nothing more.

WC has pandered to PvP enough, it's time the BETTER mode that is PvE got something nice for a change.

4 minutes ago, thehalogrunt798 said:

i love new creatures so do many of you. then why do you hate that we are getting a fourth creature like come on they wanted you guys to be happy and now you are all fussy and whiny about getting a fourth creature

 

It's not so much that we hate we are getting four creatures as it is WHAT that fourth is. We don't need more big carnivores, period.

9 minutes ago, CosmicSkeleton said:

I don't consider capitulation good in any circumstance. I'd have been just as hesistant if the bat lost but still got added despite voting for it. You don't cheapen the vote by offering the grandprize to the runner up too and you don't get it in people's heads that they can get their way even after losing. It only breeds a spoiled consumer base.

I agree, Carchara adds nothing of value. It's just a big Carnivore with typical Carnivore features. We don't need yet another big Carnivore, yet we are getting it anyway because a bunch of snot-nosed children were crying loud enough for the devs to cave. I hope it ends up being the weakest thing in the game just to spite them.

2 minutes ago, CosmicSkeleton said:

It maintained second in the vote replay as sad as it is to see, and while it won't be released alongside the other three it's eventually getting added later. Bit sad really, I would've preferred the bison. I'm actually really surprised it didn't gain as much traction in the vote proper considering the support it had.

Either way, They are going to cry about it on the note that "It's not what they wanted"... That being a Giga TLC. will it be better than the rex? Probably not. Will it be better than giga? Everything is better than giga. Did we need it? Nope. Do giga fans care? They are 8-10 years old, they shouldn't even be on the internet alone never mind playing a game they aren't old enough to own.

On the plus side we got a Giant bat, and who knows who animal #3 is? we will pound it into the heads of Carchara fans that their desire was a very bad idea.

5 minutes ago, Samdaman1995 said:

They shouldn't have let it be an option and say that it's never going to be added to silence them

That would just result in them crying anyway. Just look at the last vote.

1 minute ago, Samdaman1995 said:

Wot?

it's being added as a free bonus. No relation to the new map at all. It's (likely) only getting added to keep the whiners quiet.

10 minutes ago, Samdaman1995 said:

Congratulations you guys let second place go to another large theropod instead of something unique...what a waste

Carchara didn't get second place, it's not even getting released with the three creatures that come with the new map.

Let's be real here, Carchara is only being added later to shut the fans up XD

The Heck is Stadia?

We don't need any more big carnivores, so I honestly hope people are putting carchara far away from the top as it should be.

7 hours ago, survivorofthearks said:

What about a big hadrosaur?

 

Wouldn't mind one, we only have one after all (two if you include Iguano but I don't know why you would)

10 hours ago, akosmc5 said:

Only the Carcharodontosaurus, the Bison, the Titanoceratops and the Armadillosuchus make sense. We don't need ugly bugs and bats. 

We also don't need any more big carnivores, so you can take Carchara off too

Something I don't understand about this voting system is that I can't tell who's in the lead. the system from the last poll was better tbh

10 hours ago, basilmemories said:

yes.

Non sarcastic answer, I really don't see the use for this guy considering we already have one useless carno, aka... the carno. The giga is your all-around bitey boy, the rex is your boss dino, the yuty is the bard, and carnos uh... have tiny arms. Even the allosaurus and it's pack bleed effect doesn't really see much use, so the carno's weaker bleed is honestly a joke. So why are we putting in this new guy again? Ah yes "he bite real good". Excellent, ship it. Perfect reasoning there. Like at least 90% of the finalists are new body types, this guy is yet another two legged chomp child. give him interesting abilities or put him in the bin.

Or like, deck him out in glorious feathers, I will 1000% vote for a worthless creature with gorgeous plumage.

100% agreed, we don't need any more big carnivores, we have enough.

Is it time to watch carcharadontosaurus lose again?

Okay a few things after reading this thread.

One.... STOP CRYING ABOUT CHARCHARADONTOSAURUS! It LOST, it's OVER! MOVE ON!

Two, I honestly hope that one of the new breedables is the rock Drake (and it STAYS breedable). I could care less about the other one (though Either the Griffon or Basilisk would be cool), but please just let us breed these damn lizards already.

Three, and most importantly, the Sino looks awesome. Just as I'd imagine it'd look in ARK, and I can't wait to get my hands on it. I didn't vote for it, but I'm starting to wish that I did.