Jump to content

Maria064

Members
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Maria064

  1. Wild Card once again shoot them self in the foot Who in there right mind will rent a server just to keep there stuff? keep in mind that the official server are very bad they crash often and there is always some problem. So now we have to pay for it and have the same bad problems as it where on official? Hell no. Will not buy Survival Ascended. Wild Card keep showing over and over again that all they care about money and not the costumers/players
  2. Think they will move up the release date once again for ASA its typical wild card. sad that there is no event. Should be. all there costumers deserve it. After sticking with Wild Card for years trough all the bad things. But What happens when ARK 2 is released . Will they shut down ASA then too??
  3. Dose this change the shutdown date for the Official servers also? And when will get a color event? there should be a last one
  4. Why didn't we get a dino color event? we got it last year. and since the next event will be Halloween we won't get an event before the servers shut down. Its only fair to the costumers / players to get one last color event
  5. The art of ARK ascendant don't make me want to buy the game. In game footage do that. And that Wild Card won't release that until some time before the game launch is very suspicious. Would not be surprised if they say they need to move up the release of it like with ARK 2
  6. Love all the art. They are so good! if the foliage is so much more detailed then in ARK 1. Won't that mean that the size of the game will be even bigger and take more of the PC?
  7. The Creature suggestion is only about the creature. and not its abilities. People always forget that when voting. You should vote for the Creature it self. Not vote on it because of what it can do in the suggestions. Wild card only care about the animal it self and will come up with there own thing for the abilities
  8. Wild Card just give more and more reasons to not support them anymore.
  9. Why did it take SO long for Wild Card to say ARK will be delayed? instead of showing us art of the game every Community Crunch they should just have given an announcement much earlier about it. I Sure as Hell won't pay for the *new* game and the DLC for it ! Won't get ARK2 either. Wild card always do this. Delay things for months and even years! always disappointing. and shutting down officials sucks to. The New version of ARK and ARK 2 will be full of bugs too. Wild card never fixed the bugs in the first game. And with every single update they did, there where just new bugs ! And we never got the breed able Griffins!
  10. When will get some news about the Rhyniognatha? All the art is amazing as alway . The Wyvern one is so beautiful
  11. The big problem is also that so may scientist and paleontologist refer to the Archaeoraptor as the missing link. to be the proof the dinosaurs became birds. But they cant and should not refer to it for it was proven to be a fake made by humans under the 90s. but how can thy sit there and say its the missing link and proof for it when it wasn't even a real animal? it never existed for its put together by different animals. one small land animal and some other things cant remember the name of it Another link to it. https://crev.info/2019/03/why-is-china-the-leader-in-feathered-dinosaur-fossils/
  12. Modern birds found with dinosaurs https://creation.com/modern-birds-with-dinosaurs Theropod Dinosaurs Evolved Into Birds? Not Likely, Says Study https://www.science20.com/news_articles/theropod_dinosaurs_evolved_birds_not_likely_says_study Fossil shows birds evolved before dinosaurs https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2000/06/23/142745.htm Why birds are NOT descended from dinosaurs https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1192019/Why-birds-NOT-descended-dinosaurs.html More Proof That Dinosaurs Lived with 'Later' Creatures https://www.icr.org/article/more-proof-that-dinosaurs-lived-with
  13. Most likely not. Here more info. Birds Did Not Evolve from Dinosaurs, Say Evolutionists Oregon State University scientists have released a new study debunking the alleged evolution of dinosaurs into birds. Oregon State University scientists have released a new study debunking the alleged evolution of dinosaurs into birds. Birds did not evolve from dinosaurs: what creationists have been pointing out for years is now buttressed by new research. The study focuses on the relationship between birds’ leg and pelvis anatomy and their breathing system, and notes the absence of that relationship in dinosaurs. This is only the latest volley in the debate over bird evolution. Expect to hear either a sharp, vocal response from other evolutionists—or total silence. Background The research hinges—almost literally—on the femur (upper leg bone) of birds. Unlike other walking creatures, a bird’s femur does not move significantly, and birds instead articulate the lower portion of their leg to walk or run. Quick’s surprising discovery is that this “knee running” anatomy, with nearly fixed femur bones and musculature, is crucial in preventing a bird’s air-sac lung from collapsing whenever the bird takes a breath. Quick explained, “This is fundamental to bird physiology. It’s really strange that no one realized this before. The position of the thigh bone and muscles in birds is critical to their lung function, which in turn is what gives them enough lung capacity for flight.” Dinosaurs lack this fixed femur, however, and that includes the theropod dinosaurs from which birds supposedly evolved. Oregon State zoologist John Ruben, a coauthor on the paper, commented, “Theropod dinosaurs had a moving femur and therefore could not have had a lung that worked like that in birds. Their abdominal air sac, if they had one, would have collapsed. That undercuts a critical piece of supporting evidence for the dinosaur-bird link.” He continued, “It’s really kind of amazing that after centuries of studying birds and flight we still didn’t understand a basic aspect of bird biology.” Ruben added that the appearance of birds before dinosaurs in the fossil record is a “serious problem” that is ignored by those who advocate dinosaur-to-bird evolution “That’s quite possible and is routinely found in evolution. It just seems pretty clear now that birds were evolving all along on their own and did not descend directly from the theropod dinosaurs, which lived many millions of years later,”
  14. There have been so many fake fossils with feathers. I find it very hard to believe they had actually had feather. Here a copy paste of the problem with fake fossils scientists consider so-called “feathered dinosaurs” strong evidence of dinosaurs evolving into birds. Clearly defined anatomy-based species categories exist for ‘bird’ and ‘dinosaur,’ but evolution requires some bird-dinosaur transition, and this is where the fossils found in China fit in. Only birds, not mammals or reptiles, have modern flight feathers. Furthermore, with a possible few controversial exceptions, all extinct animals with feathers were birds. Even the proteins in bird feathers, called keratins, are unique. One important result was that no evidence for the theory that dinosaurs evolved into birds was found in the Liaoning Province fossils. This is a problem because in the Liaoning Province birds are found nearby the dinosaurs they supposedly evolved from, yet no transitional fossils which are part dinosaur and part bird have been found to link dinosaurs to birds. One claim was made of such a find which we will discuss. If the evolution of dinosaurs into birds occurred, we would expect that many transitional forms, or at least some, would be discovered among the thousands of fossils found in the Liaoning Province. Thus, when a transitional form was announced in 1999, it caused worldwide excitement. The transition, called Archaeoraptor, made headlines. The November 1999 National Geographic cover excitedly reported “It’s a Missing Link between terrestrial dinosaurs and birds that could fly.” The full color article added it “is a true missing link in the complex chain that connects dinosaurs to birds.” Later, an imaging technique called Cross Section Computerized Tomography revealed it to be a sloppy forgery, built from three separate layers. Two (the top and bottom) were constructed from natural material, and one (the middle layer) was human added. The bottom layer was a piece of shale that was used as the backing on which was placed grout to hold the dozens of separate pieces of rock and bone used to construct the now-proven forgery. Archaeoraptor is evidently only the tip of a large forgery pile. The “flood of ‘improved,’ reconfigured and composite” fossils now in existence is enormous. Many have ended up in the world’s museums, and have caused major problems in Darwinists’ efforts to defend various evolution theories. What some describe as a “flood of sham fossils pouring out of China” has, with good reason, caused no small number of persons to be skeptical of all new fossil finds from China. One report listed 107 journal retractions of research papers by Chinese authors whose research was questionable. In 2003, evolutionary fossil bird expert Alan Feduccia, referring to the famous Archaeoraptor ‘feathered dinosaur’ fossil widely touted by the National Geographic that turned out to be a fake, stated that Archaeoraptor is just the tip of the iceberg. There are scores of fake fossils out there, and they have cast a dark shadow over the whole field. When you go to these fossil shows, it’s difficult to tell which ones are faked and which ones are not High-quality fossil forgeries can fool paleontologists just as easily as forgeries in the art community … Luis Chiappe, an early bird expert at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County in California, says that he will “always be skeptical of any specimen that is so neatly arranged, so well preserved in a single slab with little bone missing”
  15. The Carno look amazing! But i don't like that the raptor have feathers. RIP Tony Schnur The dinosaur and mammal art is amazing as always!
  16. Are so disappointed that the Rhyniognatha won. Would rather the Gorgonopsid or one of the cats or even the bison win instead. Think Wild Card will make it very small. Since in real life its the size of a small mosquito. Think Wild card kinda gives us a hint also. the Picture they Chose of the Rhyniognatha is showing how small it actually is.
×
×
  • Create New...