Jump to content

Tom77795

Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tom77795

  1. The idea itself is neat however I feel like unless there is a way to have this also be able to go on land i’m not sure if it’s actually such a great addition. Yeah storing dinos and whatnot would be cool but at the same time, what is the point of me storing flyers or land dinos on something like this? Can’t use those tames underwater anyways and would have to go on land regardless so as much as the idea is cool I feel like it’s a bit flawed of an idea if it’s limited to just water. If this gets reworked in the future to also be able to go on land and be a fully functioning water and land base (like what a megachelon WAS supposed to be) but of course they made that one much smaller than originally depicted. if this gets that rework in future il vote for this #1 in the future polls but for now it’s going last just because I personally feel the hermit crab just makes much more sense to be added in the game and I know the competition will be between this one and that for this vote. Overall great idea, just needs some adjustments so it can go on land. Option: The saddle gives it a hover ability to go on land. In any case, good luck with the polls!
  2. Il be voting for this one number 1. But wouldn’t shock me if some meh creature wins again since apparently people can easily mass vote and rig things like how Yi qi won the last vote out of nowhere with a massive jump the last day.
  3. I like this idea however the only thing drawing me back is this can’t go on land from what I understand, which is understandable but just imagine being able to go on land too. For sure getting in my top 3 when voting.
  4. I like this but it’s design changed a lot from the last submission unless that was a different Gorg. This new design looks too much like the Fasolasuchus original’s drawing design was during the last voting so i’m not entirely sure about this one personally.
  5. Can’t believe the bison made it on the top 10 voting again but at least I know what i’m putting last. This would have been good for Fjordur but that’s long past now and the bison simply has no place in ark anymore honestly. Hard pass for me personally but good luck.
  6. I have never once defended the Carcharodontosaurus nor claimed it offers anything new, so your argument is invalid lol better luck next time. Perhaps pay attention and read again what i wrote. I clearly said they are adding that out of pity. but in any case it’s still better than the bison to me at least, it’s a carnivore that’s bigger than a rex if i recall correctly. Much rather have that than a bison.
  7. How was the vote rigged. Please stop spreading nonesense. the reason the bat won is because it’s unique and special, while the other options were nice too the bat is definitely a unique edition to the game. i’m sorry but why would people want a bison? Out of all the unique choices that actually offers something new, you want a bison which literally adds nothing new to the game? In my opinion the bison was the least unique option on the list. It charges forward, ok cool rhino can do same thing, it can harvest things ok cool once again so can other tames. Oh it helps with breeding? Maewing and couple other tames already do that and incubator exists nowadays. what exactly does the bison offer that would actually be new and beneficial? Nada that’s why it lost. the other dino that won, won out of pity because the last few dino votes it always came close to the top but never quite 1st place. It’s as simple as that. i’m not saying the bison wouldn’t be a nice addition to the game i just find literally all the other choices to be way more unique and actually bring something new to the game. i run a cluster and i personally know at least 100 people voted for the bat just from my cluster, the numbers are legit.
  8. Yes because we want wildcard to continue to release content way before it’s ready to be released filled with glitches and bugs like they have been in the past, honestly if they are finally actually fixing their stuff up and making a polished dlc i am 100% okay with waiting rather then going on a map just to crash or other bs issues occur making it not playable.
  9. Honestly you want to know why they removed it? Simple really, money. Why would they keep an option in the game that actually allows players to play the game? No they did this to push more people to purchase garbagenado as that is literally the only way to play the game now unless you go solo or official servers. If you want a small server you host with your own rules well too bad because Wildcard only cares about money. Really amazing how conviently being able to host worlds on a 2nd console stopped working due to massive amount of bugs and world reseting every time you turn server off that this all started happening so much to the point where it’s impossible now to host from a 2nd console, interesting how this happened around same time nitrado was introduced to xbox. Yes issues was always in this game but it was still playable on a 2nd console with minimal issues. Now it’s impossible pretty much. I am not saying they purposely added those issues in or anything but honestly to me it feels that way because guess what pushes people to pay for nitrado which means dollar bills. Don’t have to agree with me but as someone who has played ark since week one and got a 2nd console to host i been through all this. Wildcard can keep making excuses and avoiding fixes these major bugs that break the game hosting wise outside of nitrado but them saying the xbox is simply not strong enough to handle hosting well i call bullpoop, conan exiles is just as big as ark and that runs pretty damn smooth with no major problems like this. Honestly was going to come back to ark since i missed playing it but seeing as how the tether option is removed well i certainly am not going to pay for nitrado services again when last time their customer service was terrible and my server settings kept changing back like it’s not saving. What really annoys me is that some settings do get saved but some don’t so how the hell does that make sense when i update it at the same time but it randomly decides oh nah we just won’t apply that code to increase Etc etc. If something does not save then surely the WHOLE SET of changes i am applying should not save but seeing as how some do get saved and some don’t that will forever remain a mystery to me. I always had to restart and repeat a few times until it does save and gets properly applied but then next day when i restart server, the changes undo itself again after already having been applied and literally saved and in effect previously. So no i don’t think i will spend more money on. Nitrado or Ark anymore. That’s my rant take it however you wish.
×
×
  • Create New...