Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback


Community Reputation

81 First Tame

About Ryuk

  • Rank
    Cloth Armor

Personal Information

  • ARK Platforms Owned

Recent Profile Visitors

1,499 profile views
  1. Ryuk


    I stayed in the Ark Survival Evolved discord for only a week and that admin threatened to ban me 3 different times for the pettiest of reasons. I believe the admin Spork Witch is either very young or is a manchild with some form of mental instability. You're better off trying to contact the devs through another way. Good luck getting unbanned. Don't have too much faith in Wildcard getting back to you though.
  2. Nowhere in the terms of service does it say you can't showcase exploits on platforms Wildcard don't own such as Youtube. It only covers Wildcard's official websites and their game itself. Check their code of conduct if you don't believe me. If you're on official you have been meshed before at least once. There is no way that people haven't been exposed to meshing if they play official. People deserve to know the truth and see how easy it is so they know exactly what kind of game they're playing. If the developers cannot protect these players from meshers I think they should at least be allowed for them to see how easy meshing is so they can opt out of spending several hours a day grinding in a game only to lose it all because of a single guy with rockets and some climbing picks blew up your base from below. Yes, I've seen their posts where they claim it's out of their control pretty much. I don't think that's good enough. Name one other highly successful game which is plagued with this many major exploits that hasn't got fixed in 3 years. You can't. Good developers fix their games. Their attempts quite frankly, aren't enough. This game is a mess and I see no reason why people can't expose that fact. Like I said earlier, posting a video on a third party website about meshing does not break the terms of service. You are assuming you understand my viewpoint when you do not. If somebody broke the rules and got banned I really couldn't care less but HOD didn't break the rules. Also I care about some people who have been banned unfairly, but that simply has no relevance to this topic and it seems you're just trying to debunk my views by randomly calling me a hypocrite lol Oh look, another wild assumption. Comparing that to 0-day exploits is rather bizarre. I'm also pretty sure you have me mistaken as some kind of raving lunatic. I do not support meshing but it's clear a big change needs to happen on this game as for the longest time nothing has changed and this video/controversy might trigger that very change. Wildcard are not doing enough and need to step up their "fixes" and this video might be the kick up the bum that they need. Also, you know what I do support? Good developers who make good games.
  3. You're saying he should have stayed banned for exposing an issue which has plagued Ark since release? That's ludicrous. Also reporting bugs and exploits the way Wildcard ask doesn't work. What HOD did was expose a real problem this game has been facing for 3 years now to the public. There was nothing wrong with what he did. It needs to be talked about and it needs to be constantly brought up to these developers or else they will ignore their community like they have been for the last 3 years. Also even if he did make the video because he got ignored and meshed... why can't he? What's your point exactly? He has a right to honestly review a game and bring up the faults it has. The people who are saying HOD should have been banned have all these ridiculous reasons to justify it such as "he only did it because he got meshed and he was salty!" or "he did it for publicity and money!!" which are points which are completely left redundant of relevance or meaning. It's like you're all missing the point of the whole video.
  4. I can't name any other highly successful game which is riddled as badly with bugs and exploits as this game is. Most developers fix MAJOR issues as fast as they can. Wildcard are not like most developers. You all need to accept the harsh reality that this game is never getting fixed.
  5. With that logic it turns into "he said, she said" and the person holding the power will always win. I am much more likely to listen to HOD gaming over a faceless dev who I'd like to remind you has yet to fix this mess of a game. Also considering their selective heavy handed enforcement over official servers, this does not surprise me in the slightest. They are the kinds of people who avoid fixing major issues within their game and rather respond with quick bans instead. Sure, he could have submitted a support ticket, but considering they banned him in the first place I think he has a right to tell people about it because if this is true it's actually disgusting.
  6. There is still holes which I know about and checked literally today to see if they were fixed.
  7. He is guilty of no crime as the footage he used was not on the official servers. He simply talked about the massive issue meshing is on official servers and showed how scarily easy it is. Should he really get punished for this? I don't think so. HOD is simply guilty for exposing the truth. This video shows Wildcards negligence and makes them look bad so they banned him as an emotional response. The people who defend his ban are missing the point of the whole video. The more people that know how to exploit the mesh means the louder this community will become. It's pretty clear that they have seen the video and their response was to ban HOD. How about they try to actually fix their game by removing mechanics which promote meshing? How about they fix the holes in their maps??? This all is absolutely ridiculous and if Wildcard knew what they were doing it would have got fixed a long time ago. The state of ark, its developers and community is so incredibly pathetic.
  8. This stuff is neat and all but there is still stuff on Extinction which REALLY needs balancing. Managarmr has ridiculous range on an already OP attack. I'd also mention Titans but they're pretty self explanatory.
  9. Should any of the extinction creatures be allowed on extinction though? I thought the plan for aberration was only to allow native creatures but I suppose Wildcard totally forgot about that.
  10. Don't worry guys Wildcard have finished their DLC and are now focusing on their kibble rework! ??????
  11. I don't like paying for the same content over and over. I didn't buy ArkPark, I didn't buy Dark and Light, I didn't buy PixArk and I for sure as hell won't be buying Atlas. Why? Well because I think purchasing this game blindly would be a poor investment. I also haven't seen enough to make me want to buy this game. Everything they had said I struggle to believe until I actually see it as I have little faith in Wildcard, Snailgames and any other company connected to them. Oh, and I saw the trailer. All I saw was reskinned creatures and a few interesting things (such as ships, ocean physics, water bosses) which I imagine could easy be implemented into current Ark via mod. The megalodons model was altered slightly into a hammerhead shark. The hydra greatly resembles the model from snailgames Dark and Light. The cyclops also resembles the one from dark and light. There is also a reskinned rock elemental from Ark. The fire elemental next to the rock elemental in the trailer is a clear reskin of the one in dark and light also. Then there is everything they were too lazy to change in this game. I genuinely feel like they are just getting lazy at this point and want to milk easy money. To me Atlas looks just like all the other Ark clones that came before it (ArkPark, Dark and Light, PixArk). I do not care for reskins. I do not care for buying content I already purchased. From watching the trailer I did not get the impression of a new game. Once it releases and I see actual gameplay maybe I might change my mind... but do I want to buy it on release? No thank you. If you are willing to splash about £20-$30 on this game feel free. I just ask that you wait to see the true state of this game before you decide to buy or not. It may flop very much like the clone attempts before it. Also keep in mind that the current state of Ark is not in a very good place right now after 3 years of development. Even if Atlas becomes popular it may end up suffering the exact same issues Ark does. Do you think they are willing to fix issues if they can't even be bothered to invest time into brand new content such as creatures for their new game?? To me it all seems like it's rushed with quantity over quality. So yeah, I imagine this game will fair rather poorly in all honesty.
  12. Ryuk

    new game: Atlas

    If that's the case why are they being lazy and not working on new models?
  13. Ryuk

    new game: Atlas

    In the latest trailer the creatures in this game are reskins of assets they already own. The megalodons model was altered slightly into a hammerhead shark. The hydra greatly resembles the model from snailgames Dark and Light. The cyclops also resembles the one from dark and light. There is also a reskinned rock elemental from Ark. The fire elemental next to the rock elemental in the trailer is a clear reskin of the one in dark and light also. The structures textures haven’t even been changed in this new game. They are just getting lazy. How many times are they going to keep doing this? ArkPark, Dark and Light, Pixark and now this? Sure Atlas has different people working on it but it's basically the exact same thing. They are selling people reskins. Barely anything in this "new" game is actually new. It could have been implemented into Ark as a mod or as a DLC but no. They clearly want people to pay around £20 for this. Think very wisely before purchasing this game. Most of the other Ark clones flopped hard.
  14. Atlas? The game that looked just like Ark and was accidentally uploaded onto Ark Survival Evolved's own youtube channel 4 months ago only to be removed shortly afterwards? The game people mistook for a DLC because it's mostly all of Arks original assets? Yeah... no. Snailgames already tried that with ArkPark, Dark and Light and Pixark. No thank you lol
  15. Ryuk


    Yeah... They really went all out with this DLC and made the most ridiculous broken content yet. I understand they wanted it to impress their fans as it's the last DLC but they really should have thought about balance. They honestly need somebody on their team who has common sense to say "Wait guys this isn't a good idea" to balance out their game. Also I find it absolutely hilarious that they keep making the same mistakes over and over again.
  • Create New...