Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/17/2023 in all areas

  1. I totally agree the Yi Qi which we voted for was a lithe peacock assassin but now we have a big fat terror bird.
    2 points
  2. I've been saying this since the vote for the center was announced. The center feels like a unfinished island compared to all the other maps & it's upseting. The map has so much potential, I really hope it doesn't get left in the dirt again.
    1 point
  3. Good to see the center finally mentioned. Now, can we hear if we will get any changes to engrams? (Will we have cryos, nets, canoe) Can you also change up what dinos spawn on the island?
    1 point
  4. key words in my post is "we may get" may1 verb 1. expressing possibility. "that may be true"
    1 point
  5. .. I'm reporting here too because today I feel "annoying" Interesting to note that the "Community Crounch" are so interesting that....we are still responding to the previous week's CC (..well...not that there is anything new for us to answer....and I repeat: from our part; if we talk "from WC" ohhhhhh better not open the list !!!) ..
    1 point
  6. 1 point
  7. Spitballing ideas here but if they still let it have bleed they’ll probably turn it into an overgrown secretary bird with a bleed kick since it’s tail isn’t long enough to launch quills.
    1 point
  8. It's a community-submitted, community-voted creature... if THAT is not a form of fanservice, then the word has lost all meaning. To be clear, people are responding to the visuals of the creature. As far as I know we haven't heard what precise set of abilities will be retained. So the wonky wing and/or the Terror Bird look are the issue most people have been bringing up with the design ; not gameplay mechanics, balance or anything like that My personal theory is that we haven't seen the dossier yet because they might be working on redesigning it a bit after getting feedback. At least they will if they haven't completely lost their minds. I vaguely remember that it has happened before, someone refresh my memory, what creature was it for ? That's a big question of mine since the submission stage. It's supposed to eviscerate creatures... but [at least in ASE] we barely have blood, and zero viscera in this game. Not sure how that is supposed to materialize. Speaking of submissions, those for The Center have been closed and archived, but I don't see a link on Twitter yet for the ranking. Anyone knows if it's been posted elsewhere ?
    1 point
  9. For those seeking more information. Take with a grain of salt but this is what we're looking at potentially. Thanks to those working on ASA!
    1 point
  10. 1 point
  11. 1 point
  12. First off the fact that you are not getting ASA purely based on the fact that a creature that wins the votes has feathers is CRAZY. Second the gigantoraptor is flightless and is like a giant Oviraptor, and the Yi Qi is a glider. Just because they have feathers does not mean they are a flyer.
    1 point
  13. You make a valid point haha. I guess you could equate it to looking through an art gallery at the Art Museum!
    1 point
  14. It might look like that to someone who doesn't understand how ranked voting works.
    1 point
  15. I wonder how many checks they will have sent Vin Diesel by this time. Will be great for my grandchildren to watch the first episode of the animated series in 2090.
    1 point
  16. I respect your opinion and is nice to see the opinion of other people being done in a respectfully way, i thank you for that. I only saw the promo picture of this creature i don't know how he will looks like in the end or his abilities, however the complaining of the people doesn't make sense. One of the things they stated in the submitions is that the creature may change from his original concept. I may be wrong but what i understand from that, is that it will be added in a way that work better on the game, they making the creature 100% identical or almost identical, or at least with several aspects the comunity suggested for it ir a bonus! The maim core of the votes is for the players to have a creature they like but is not on the game yet added, and the suggestion for the abilities and behaviour are inspiration for the developers. Everybody who voted for Yi Ling knew this, because of that, complaining about this doesn't make sense, if the creature change for better of for worse, it was stated that it could be changed, so it doesn't make sense. Also some of the aspects suggested in creature submissions would not work well on the game, and some of them would work better for situations especifically or in another creatures. What i'm saying, i'm saying with respect, but the majority of the players are not professional in the subject, they have to understand that! (And there is no problem in this). And the game is something serious they cannot make 100% fan service, it has to be something that work well in a professional game, with the game type, mechanics and alot of other things to considerate that needs to be funtional or balanced properly in a game. They have the right to say if they like it or not but complaining about this doesn't make sense because of that, don't you agree?
    0 points
  17. yo, did the last patch fixed an issue related to dragon guardian spawning in the map outside the boss arena in the island? :V cuze a friend just got half wiped yesterday by an alpha dragon spawning in the island (official pve) :V
    0 points
  18. I hope that this creature for The Center does not have feathers. Ragnarok got a feathered creature, Aberration got a feathered creature, if The Center gets a bird, then I am NOT getting the UE5 ARK. It will have too many fliers. I mean, fliers are a good thing, but only those that can regenerate stamina while not moving, but still flying.
    0 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...