Draw2Death Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Just why? Why do people rig these votes? I hope this thing doesent get added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vageera Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Qué sorpresa 😒😒😒 Otra joya de la comunidad hispanohablante... ¿no se cansan de arruinarle las cosas a las personas que realmente les interesa el juego? en verdad, ¿no podemos tener cosas bonitas sin que algún streamer de 1000 personas llegue con su séquito a arruinarlo todo?... Saben perfectamente que está mal traer a otras personas ajenas al juego a influenciar una votación, y aún así se justifican diciendo que no les hicieron saber puntualmente que no debían hacerlo... Seguramente también se roban el carrito del súper, ¿no? al fin que no es ilegal hacerlo... Que decepción, nunca espero nada de la comunidad hispanohablante y aún así, siempre nos hacen quedar en ridículo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BewareOfJabberwock Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 51 minutes ago, Kingkestrel373 said: Shame that someone posted the exact same creature and now their gonna get into the final vote and this original is not. Hey.. you're right. Shouldn't that disqualify the newer post? It's one of the rules that there can't be two threads for the same idea. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingkestrel373 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 (edited) 8 minutes ago, BewareOfJabberwock said: Hey.. you're right. Shouldn't that disqualify the newer post? It's one of the rules that there can't be two threads for the same idea. Yeah a couple people have been posting about it on the copies thread but nobody has done anything yet. I think it’s up to wildcard to decide if it’s in or out. Edited January 24 by Kingkestrel373 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteer Moderator Joebl0w13 Posted January 24 Volunteer Moderator Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Kingkestrel373 said: Yeah they should probably add this to the original thread for the cave lion. It literally says in the rules one submission per creature. If they don’t do it that seems really unfair to the original poster. @Joebl0w13 does this mean it’s disqualified? Probably not. It made the top 10 but whether or not it is in the next round of voting is up to WildCard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingkestrel373 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Just now, Joebl0w13 said: Probably not. It made the top 10 but whether or not it is in the next round of voting is up to WildCard. Thanks for clearing that up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteer Moderator Joebl0w13 Posted January 24 Volunteer Moderator Share Posted January 24 8 minutes ago, BewareOfJabberwock said: Hey.. you're right. Shouldn't that disqualify the newer post? It's one of the rules that there can't be two threads for the same idea. It would just mean it would have been merged into the original. The votes for it would have actually been higher after combining them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteer Moderator Joebl0w13 Posted January 24 Volunteer Moderator Share Posted January 24 7 hours ago, Ark2whennn said: Could WC team do the same thing that was done before with the sinomacrops? This creature was posted before by another guy who's name is @ThatChimichanga , so it wouldn't be fair if this post makes to the 2nd fase and the original doesn't make it . He posted it on 14th January while this was posted yesterday. We are looking into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BewareOfJabberwock Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 7 minutes ago, Joebl0w13 said: It would just mean it would have been merged into the original. The votes for it would have actually been higher after combining them. Yeah that makes sense I guess. Just makes it look even more bad faith though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeel Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Kingkestrel373 said: Shame that someone posted the exact same creature and now their gonna get into the final vote and this original is not. This is really insane.. the post should have been merged to this one. For ours it was instantaneous, I don't see why it's not the same for here.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingkestrel373 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 minute ago, Skeel said: This is really insane.. the post should have been merged to this one. For ours it was instantaneous, I don't see why it's not the same for here.. I think the moderators are investigating it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteer Moderator Joebl0w13 Posted January 24 Volunteer Moderator Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, BewareOfJabberwock said: Yeah that makes sense I guess. Just makes it look even more bad faith though. I personally would like to merge the other into this one. Credit due to the OP post. We'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteer Moderator Joebl0w13 Posted January 24 Volunteer Moderator Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Kingkestrel373 said: I think the moderators are investigating it Fixed. Credit to the OP for the submission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EMI0410 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Joebl0w13 said: Probablemente no. Llegó a los 10 primeros, pero si está o no en la siguiente ronda de votación depende de WildCard. But does that mean that all the votes of Mayichi's proposal move towards the other participant's? It is strange that just because of the publication date all the 662 are removed from the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EMI0410 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Hace 2 minutos, EMI0410 dijo: Pero, ¿significa eso que todos los votos de la propuesta de Mayichi se dirigen hacia los del otro participante? Es extraño que solo por la fecha de publicación todos los 662 se eliminen del otro. even doing that would make it more Fair for Mayichi's post to be the top one and the other one to be merged since it has more votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteer Moderator Jerryn Posted January 24 Volunteer Moderator Share Posted January 24 (edited) 5 minutes ago, EMI0410 said: But does that mean that all the votes of Mayichi's proposal move towards the other participant's? It is strange that just because of the publication date all the 662 are removed from the other. When threads are merged, the unique votes are combined. The post and author kept at the top is the one with the earliest posting date. Both are automatic features of the system...moderators have no control over those. Edited January 24 by Jerryn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteer Moderator Joebl0w13 Posted January 24 Volunteer Moderator Share Posted January 24 2 minutes ago, EMI0410 said: even doing that would make it more Fair for Mayichi's post to be the top one and the other one to be merged since it has more votes. The second post (with more votes) should have never happened. It should have been merged right into the original post. It was missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vageera Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 On 1/22/2023 at 11:21 PM, APerson1 said: alright scratch my viva la revolution, posting on your instagram and sending 800k random dudes to vote for your virtual lion is not coolEDIT: Hey all, just a heads-up here. I understand that a rumour (that I unfortunately had a hand in spreading) has popped up that this streamer has been garnering votes by giving free access to a certain site to those who vote. These allegations have since proven to be false, as the whole basis of the rumour was non-native speakers misinterpreting a joke as a statement. The rumours of Nexxuz's involvement are also false. Regardless of how I feel about her influencing the vote, spreading misinformation to destroy someone's reputation is not cool. You're partially right about it. there ARE streamers involved, and there is an insane amount of people that don't even play the game voting for this creature (they blatantly express that on twitter, "I don't play ark but I will vote for your creature"). More importantly, Nexxuz IS involved, not directly, but he and the other ARKianos (a group of hispanic streamers) they influenced this person (actually a streamer) to submmit this creature. Whether this was meant to be a scapegoat or merely unintentional, the damage is done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EMI0410 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Hace 10 minutos, Joebl0w13 dijo: El segundo puesto (con más votos) nunca debería haber ocurrido. Debería haberse fusionado directamente con la publicación original. Se perdió. So we can expect a change from the system and that it be changed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EMI0410 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Hace 15 minutos, Jerryn dijo: Cuando se fusionan los hilos, los votos únicos se combinan. La publicación y el autor que se mantienen en la parte superior es el que tiene la fecha de publicación más temprana. Ambas son características automáticas del sistema... los moderados no tienen control sobre ellas. Is there a possibility that it will be updated and that the post with the most votes will be seen as the main one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteer Moderator Joebl0w13 Posted January 24 Volunteer Moderator Share Posted January 24 2 minutes ago, EMI0410 said: Is there a possibility that it will be updated and that the post with the most votes will be seen as the main one? Negative. The system is what it is. None of this really matters. If it's in the top 10, there's going to be another vote. The only thing that mattered here was getting voted into the top 10. That's the vote that matters now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteer Moderator Joebl0w13 Posted January 24 Volunteer Moderator Share Posted January 24 10 minutes ago, EMI0410 said: So we can expect a change from the system and that it be changed? Negative. It is what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunShale Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 6 minutes ago, Joebl0w13 said: Negative. The system is what it is. None of this really matters. If it's in the top 10, there's going to be another vote. The only thing that mattered here was getting voted into the top 10. That's the vote that matters now. The key question is... Will Mayichi's proposal be taken into account when creating the animal since you have been the most voted, if it wins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelGamez117 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, Joebl0w13 said: Negative. It is what it is. Hello, will everything proposed by Mayichi be considered in the publication of the final votes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteer Moderator Joebl0w13 Posted January 24 Volunteer Moderator Share Posted January 24 Just now, AngelGamez117 said: Hello, will everything proposed by Mayichi be considered in the publication of the final votes? Well if it wins the next vote. That's up to WildCard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now