Community Crunch 312: Desmodus Reveal, Official ARK Wiki, and More!

[CosmicSkeleton]

7 hours ago, GP said:

Paranoid? Look back at the last two Crunches. The first was the Andrewsarchus Reveal (which pretty much provided a new artwork of it, then the second was the Andrewsarchus Creature Spotlight.

Now the next Crunch is the Desmodus Reveal, and likely next week will be the Desmodus Creature Spotlight.

The two weeks following that are likely to be the same for FjordHawk.

Not sure where the paranoia is coming from because Desmodus is clearly following the same theme as Andrewsarchus at this point.

Eh, my memory ain't the best so unless I'm actively going back to reread the ccs many of the details in them are pretty much forgotten within a day or two unless I receive notifications. Years of rum binges have really done a number on the gray matter. The only reason things like desmodus managed to remain in my mind is because I was an active participant in the vote. I just feel like these sorts of things could be done better. Rather than retread old ground in some attempt to dredge up hype better to just say "Hey, here's new art, here's a link to a previous thread detailing what the thing is". Elsewise it just feels like fluff.

Then again maybe I'm just a touch biased in this instance since I believe the creature that players had an active stake in getting into the game should be prioritized in the having its in game model revealed department.

[JakeInGame]

Does anyone know any official devs the whole submit a ticket thing is stupid it doesn’t even work and there aren’t even that many ark players

[GeneralTalon]

21 hours ago, TheTwistedKeeper said:

I'm using Norton. I figure it's showing that way because it's *new* but, I still don't like taking chances so I'll be waiting for now.

Doesn't Norton freak out over everything though?

[TheTwistedKeeper]

47 minutes ago, GeneralTalon said:

Doesn't Norton freak out over everything though?

It depends, pages with adds always tend to have problems as it scans everything on the page, if even one thing is off It'll flag it. Most times it's actually pretty chill.

[TheTwistedKeeper]

4 hours ago, alex4401 said:

We submitted a dispute yesterday, and as far as I can see the site's been reviewed and is marked as safe now in their SafeWeb system. I'm not sure how long it'll take for the antivirus to catch up. Thanks!

It's been updated, thank you I shall be using it now .

[CosmicSkeleton]

2 hours ago, JakeInGame said:

and there aren’t even that many ark players

Unless you have the analytics of ark for steam, Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, and epic games that statement has absolutely nothing backing it to make it factual.

[JakeInGame]

5 hours ago, CosmicSkeleton said:

Unless you have the analytics of ark for steam, Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, and epic games that statement has absolutely nothing backing it to make it factual.

The community forums and Facebook pages show that with the activity that’s on them and the posts that’s evidence enough you must be mental 

[CosmicSkeleton]

3 hours ago, JakeInGame said:

The community forums and Facebook pages show that with the activity that’s on them and the posts that’s evidence enough you must be mental 

I'd be genuinely surprised to find out that you can eat soup without floaties on if you actually believe that a niche forum or social media outlet is an indicator of player count. 

Edited April 25, 2022 by CosmicSkeleton

[TekTusoteuthis]

6 hours ago, JakeInGame said:

The community forums and Facebook pages show that with the activity that’s on them and the posts that’s evidence enough you must be mental 

https://steamcharts.com/top

 

37,000 current players is not a small number, and this is just steam charts. If we could pull current players from consoles I'm sure they would at least be within the same range.